If you are a film buff like me, you must be aware of the controversies surrounding Ashutosh Gowarikar's to-be-released
epic Jodhaa-Akbar. In the film, a rajput princess Jodha marries a Muhgal emperor Akbar. Some historians somehow figured out that this is not what happened. They claim that this Jodha never existed and some said that if she existed then she was Akbar's daughter-in-law and not wife.
After reading this, I did some history research of my own (google+wikipedia = research). And found out the truth. And yes, it IS stranger than the fiction. So it has to be the truth. And truth prevails. The truth shall WIN.. so on and so forth.
What I found out was very strange. According to my research, these historians who made all these claims, never existed! Yes! I went through lot of historic documents, talked to Rajput Royalties, read Akbarnama thrice and nowhere I found names of these historians. Just to be sure, I searched for "historians are *" in google and these are some of the results I got:
* Historians are divided.
* Historians are pessimists.
* Historians are gossips who tease the dead.
* Historians are storytellers.
* Historians are notorious.
* Historians are biased.
* Historians are Humorless
Clearly, with all this evidence, it is proved that historians dont exist, and if they do they are a constipated lot.
Yours Sincerely,
